Introduction
Picking through the white noise about outsourcing can be
time consuming and tedious. And while you’re busy doing all that research, your
company’s payroll and benefits problems aren’t going anywhere. You need to
outsource—but you’re not clear on the alternatives available to you.
Who Should Read This?
You will want to read this document if you are evaluating HR
outsourcing alternatives for a company between 1-100 employees.
Companies Face Several Alternatives
Outsourcing isn’t the only answer. Most small companies face
a complicated decision path when deciding what to do with business non-core
functions.
This is because small companies, even more so than their
larger counterparts, need to focus on their core competency with laser-like
precision. Any function that doesn’t directly relate to that core competency
distracts the workforce from developing the company’s product or service.
When faced with human resource challenges, companies have
three alternatives:
Create or Improve the In-House Infrastructure
Pros: Creating an in-house infrastructure gives business owners
the confidence that they are building the HR processes that are right for their
company, and psychologically it offers a sense of control. It allows a business
owner to create a company culture from the "ground up" by hiring
employees who oversee the general environment, character, and personality of
the company.
Cons: A smaller company may not have the time and resources
to build such an infrastructure. That time may better be spent on developing
the company’s product or service. It’s also possible that the right HR
provider—which forms a true "match"—may indeed be able to contribute
to the company’s internal culture by streamlining processes and offering
high-level HR expertise.
Multiple Vendors
Pros: If the decision is made to outsource the HR function,
companies may choose to seek out providers that handle disparate functions. For
example, they may select a benefits broker and a separate payroll provider. The
advantage to this approach is cost driven; a company can generally spend less
on providers that specialize in handling one particular function. That’s
because single-function providers tend to do large volumes of business in order
to keep their price point low. Cons: The time and effort of managing multiple vendors can often offset the up-front cost savings. This is particularly true if the vendors deal with related functions—such as payroll and benefits—but use separate systems or databases to do so. These means that the functions aren’t integrated and can often prove extremely difficult to manage properly. In addition, "large volume" providers may not offer the individual attention or the range of services that the company truly needs, undermining the attractiveness of the lower cost.
Single Vendor
Pros: The HR outsourcing landscape offers the ability to
outsource to a single provider. These "integrated" providers offer
payroll and benefits together on a single platform, as well as high-level HR
expertise in the form of on-site staff. Single-vendor providers can act as a
company’s entire HR department and prevent the need for in-house staff or
infrastructure.
Cons: The primary disadvantage of an integrated outsourcing
provider is that the service may be overkill for a company that only needs to
offload a single HR function. For example, if payroll is the primary problem,
the company probably only needs a payroll provider rather than an end-to-end
service. In addition, an integrated provider may offer a degree of flexibility
in its service but may not be able to accommodate specifics requests from its
customers (for example, building electronic timesheets into its online
services).
Recommendations for Due Diligence
Points to consider when evaluating HR providers:
Does the cost of the provider’s services lead to other time
and cost savings, such as reduced administrative staff, decreased employee
oversight, etc.?
Does the provider have customers willing to provide
references?
Is the provider’s fee structure easy to understand, enabling
a cost analysis of outsourcing fees versus in-house investment?
Does the provider leverage Internet delivery for time and
cost savings?
Does the provider offer a call centre for employee
questions?
What is the provider’s set-up process? How fast can it be
completed?
Disclaimer
The contents of this white paper have been prepared for
educational and information purposes only. The content does not provide legal
advice or legal opinions on any specific matters.
You should not act or refrain from acting on any legal
matter based on the content without seeking professional counsel.
Acknowledgement: www.trinet.com
No comments:
Post a Comment